A little over five years ago, I wrote a post about Moderna’s amazing success developing the Covid vaccine, which was instrumental in finally taming the worldwide pandemic. I used a Harvard Business School case to explain that mRNA was much more than simply a traditional vaccine. As a Moderna scientist put it in the case study I quoted from: “Moderna, and other companies that followed, took the use of mRNA to the next level by turning it into a drug. Following this logic, once an externally manufactured mRNA was injected into the body as a drug, the ribosomes in the cells read the injected mRNA like a code and made the protein the mRNA instructed them to make, thus leveraging the power of mRNA for the targeted production of proteins needed to fight diseases. mRNA functioned like a software instruction manual, instructing the body how to produce its own drugs.” (And the process didn’t mess with a cell’s DNA.)
The reaction of blog readers here? Probably 80% or more of the 60-plus who commented were negative on my report. No big surprise. I doubt many read it through; they saw I had made positive comments about a vaccine and stopped reading. And likely little has changed over the last five years, even though the newest Moderna vaccine, which got lots of press last week, was targeting cancer, a disease that strikes millions of Americans, young and old, each year.
Last week’s report was about a vaccine for melanoma, the most dangerous type of skin cancer, which kills about six per cent of its victims, and keeps survivors in fear for the rest of their lives after trestment that it will return in a fatal form. In one quick online survey I saw on X, an outspoken MAGA supporter , Gunther Eagleman, asked his readers if they would take a proven cancer vaccine that became available right now. Not surprisingly, it was about 70% no and 30% yes—about what my comments suggested five years ago.
Anyway, I was encouraged by the mainstream media coverage of this major development. One article profiles a man who participated in the FDA melanoma trial, which was designed to test if the cancer could be prevented from recurring, as it commonly does. The man profiled was pretty candid about both the severity of the skin cancer he had (requiring disfiguring surgery on his face), and the side effects of the vaccine (similar to the first covid vaccines).
Another article profiles a young mother who grew up in a family that refused to allow the children to be vaccinated; she didn’t receive her first vaccine until she was 23, and on her way to becoming an immunologist. The article does a nice job of tracing the woman’s arduous journey, and how she maintained a sense of compassion and understanding toward antivaxxers she continues to come in contact with, including her own mother.
And finally, this from The Wall Street Journal, about Moderna’s long twisting journey from success to despair (thanks partly to RFKJr’s sabotage), and finally to apparent success in getting through the FDA’s testing process, to the brink of approval; and also, how it is testing other cancer vaccines, for pancreatic, kidney, and lung cancers, all of which have been death sentences over the years.
I personally find all this quite amazing. I suspect more Americans will come around to support this mRNA approach for preventing cancer, simply because it is so much more targeted and predictable and less toxic than anything else we have (mainly chemotherapy). One of the reasons people have become less supportive of vaccines for contagious disease is that most of those diseases have essentially disappeared because of the vaccines; in other words, vaccines have been so effective that people have forgotten how terrible polio, diphtheria, measles, rabies, tetanus, mumps, and others really were. Cancer is much more in our faces; everyone has a relative or acquaintance affected by melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and others.
I suspect the reality of scientific achievement and the immediacy of personal experience will win out in the end.
David,
One big question…
Will this new novel mRNA vaccine be used on entire populations as a proposed preventative vaccine or…will it be used to only treat known melanoma patients?
A huge difference on all levels.
There is a massive difference on the unknown side effect impact for otherwise healthy people.
We have all seen the unknown negative impacts of mRNA vaccines on large populations of otherwise healthy people. The FDA gets paid huge money to review and approve these patented drug approvals.
Vaccine companies are suffering huge losses on their public stock values, post covid and post HPAI bird flu ( they did not get the big bucks they wanted for that one ) and this is just the rescue they are dreaming about. They market like crazy to create new solutions to medical and health issues. Congress gave them a “liability hall pass” so they are free to have all the negative side effects they want for vaccines.
Remember Gardasil? Not good…but it was heralded as the great savior for youth and sex related viruses. Plenty of sick and dead kids.
New things take time to understand. New things require independent investigation.
As far as using this for known melanoma cancer patients….that’s awesome! Nothing to lose and everything to gain.
For everyone else…not so quick.
Mark
As I understand it, the cancer vaccines are intended for people who have had cancer, to prevent them from re-occurring. If you read the profile of the study participant I linked to, you’ll see that he already had melanoma. But because melanoma tends to return again and again, in ever-more-dangerous forms, you want to be rid of it after the first occurrence. I presume the vaccines could also be offered to people who have a genetic predisposition to certain cancers; for example, breast cancer seems to show up in some families. So no mass vaccinations planned.
Then that appears to be a saving grace. If I had Melanoma…I would be reading the studies, critically looking at the data and making some serous inquiries. Thank you for sharing this apparent good news.
Interesting to note that raw milk contains mRNA which is a nucleic acid recipe to make proteins. The directions provided by mRNA are used as a design to make functional proteins that then Direct the functions of babies after the umbilical cord is cut. mRNA is the engineering team delivering the Blueprints of Life!
Raw milk does three things:
Directs ( part of the mothers mRNA messaging system )
Protects ( diversity of bacteria and the antibodies they stimulate )
Nourishes ( has everything the new human needs to thrive, fat, carbs, functional proteins amino acids, vitamins, and minerals etc! )
Pasteurized milk does not have these vital mammalian elements. Pasteurized milk is denatured and no longer Directing, Protecting and or fully Nourishing. Then add that pasteurized milk is highly allergic causing deaths every year plus uncounted numbers of near-death medical emergencies ( 911 EMS Paramedics coming to the rescue with Epi, Steroids, Benadryl, fluid replacement for shock and anaphylactic shock. This is expensive and gratefully it works most of the time and will save your life at 2 AM in the morning!! )
Wouldn’t society thrive if everyone drank their tested delicious raw milk produced by RAWMI trained farmers! We just celebrated our 71st LISTED Farmer today!
Problem is, a cancer vaccine skips over the elephant in the room. The scientific community already knows what causes cancer which they’ve traced out through decades of studying farm workers in the Central Valley of CA. It’s simply such a huge systemic problem they pretend they don’t. It’s exposure to pesticides and herbicides. Among other disruptions, those neurotoxins destroy the gut microbiome which controls the functioning of the immune system. Any artificial intervention, like a vaccine, is going to ultimately have long term consequences and could be an appropriate choice selectively. But let’s not get distracted from the bigger picture. https://kellythekitchenkop.com/benefits-of-organic-eating/
I’m not sure the causes of cancer are necessarily so limited. For example, we know that ultraviolet rays from the sun are a big factor in skin cancer (including the most dangerous one, melanoma, which is the target of the Moderna vaccine). Also, there are genetic factors within some families that lead to higher incidence of certain cancers, like breast cancer. The neurotoxins you mention are also very significant. Plus other environmental factors we don’t even fully understand. I’m also not sure that, even if we know all the causes, that means we shouldn’t develop immune responses that can ward the cancers off.
Turns out Dolly Parton had a role in Moderna’s mRNA technology. This today from Heather Cox Richardson, the historian and commentator: “In 2020, Parton donated $1 million to Vanderbilt University Medical Center to fund the research that allowed researchers to prove that mRNA vaccine technology worked. That research led to grants that enabled development of the Moderna mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 that saved millions of lives. She also helped encourage others to get vaccinated, taking her own shot on camera in a dress she had cut the shoulders out of so the doctor would have easier access.”
Your first mistake David was referring to these mRNA injections as a vaccine… they are gene altering injections that transform your body into a spike protein manufacturing system, and in my opinion that is a reckless and overall unpredictable approach at best.
When considering a recent large Japanese study that tracked nearly 20 million people where the unvaccinated suffered zero excess mortality, while the jabbed suffered wave after wave of unexplained deaths… indeed, and one out of a growing number of observations that demonstrated that excess deaths were entirely concentrated in the vaccinated group, then those who believe that the experimental genetically engineered toxic covid injection is safe and effective, aka that it saved millions of lives have been clearly indoctrinated by the vaccine paradigm… a strict mindset if you will with a rigid, uncompromising increasingly draconian approach to health care.
The late Professor Francis Boyle, a leading bioweapons expert submitted before his death an affidavit describing the COVID shots as biological weapons. That affidavit is now officially part of the court record in the Netherlands.
Ken, when you begin your criticism of the Moderna vaccine with a major inaccuracy, it kind of puts a damper on everything that follows. You say the mRNA injections are “gene altering injections…” Unless Moderna is lying, that’s not what happens. The mRNA from the vaccine never enters the cell nucleus where your DNA is stored. The genetic instructions tell your cells to build a harmless piece of a protein to train your immune system. Your body breaks down and disposes of the vaccine mRNA within a few days after it finishes making the protein. If your understanding is different, please provide a credible source.
David, you need to explore why biotech companies have decided to use fragments of an invasive monkey retrovirus/sv40 DNA in order to manufacture these mRNA injections.
They state with respect to the mRNA injections that, “An SV40 sequence is not intentionally added to mRNA vaccines as a functional ingredient for the final vaccine product. Instead, small, non-infectious fragments of an SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA sequence are remnants of the manufacturing process”. These so called “small non infectious SV40 DNA fragments are utilized, “to efficiently drive high levels of transcription (the copying of DNA into mRNA) during the industrial production phase”. If one understands how a retro virus such as SV40 work whereby it has the unique ability to utilize an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to permanently insert its own genetic material into the cell structure of the host, then this explains why the need for SV40.
I question pharma’s ability to accurately and consistently manipulate a fragment of DNA that presents itself as a mere “glowing pinpricks or lines” with the aid of “fluorescent dyes” and an “electron microscope”, especially when used in developing a so-called vaccine and I question their ability to predict the overall effect of these so-called vaccines when injected into the body?
As I understand it, despite the claims made with respect to the mRNA shots there are critical gaps in the knowledge as to how they work. It is these gaps that should concern all of us. Even more concerning is their attempt to impose that knowledge on and sensor those who don’t share their opinion. As I stated previously on this blog and that holds true today especially with respect to these mRNA injections, “The powers that be and the scientists they employ recklessly jump into this labyrinth of biological complexities breaching natural barriers and disregarding and disrespecting the unique genetic background of life forms with only surface knowledge of what they are doing”. And, as Richard Strohman, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley states, “Genes exist in networks, interactive networks which have a logic of their own. The technology point of view does not deal with these networks. It simply addresses genes in isolation. But genes do not exist in isolation. And the fact that the industry folks don’t deal with these networks is what makes their science incomplete and dangerous. Indeed, and that is clearly what’s happening with these mRNA injections.
It is becoming increasingly evident that these mRNA injections are causing serious side effects in a growing number of people. A fact that health authorities, scientist and some governments are beginning to recognize.
David, My apologies, SV40 is not a retrovirus…
My mistake in referring to SV40 as a retrovirus is described as follows, “Because SV40 has become a prominent talking point in public debates regarding historical vaccine contamination, laypersons and political figures occasionally conflate it with actual retroviruses (like HIV or XMRV) that have appeared in similar scientific controversies.”
The confusion appears to stem from two reasons “In historical molecular biology papers (such as studies on SV40 T-antigens), researchers engineered hybrid structures sometimes referred to as “SV40 retroviruses” or “MV40”. In these cases, the researchers were not calling the native SV40 a retrovirus; rather, they were describing a man-made retroviral delivery system that happened to carry an SV40 gene cargo.
Apart from this I stand by what I said in the rest of my statement.
The following Feb 6, 2026 Pub Med article titled, “Exploring the potential link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations and cancer: A case report with a review of haematopoietic malignancies with insights into pathogenic mechanisms” is well worth taking the time to read. In conclusion the article states in part, “What is the purpose of the addition of a mammalian promoter and nuclear targeting sequence from the SV40 oncovirus in the plasmid used in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer/BioNTech genetic vaccine, supposedly meant to only be used to grow copies in bacteria, where a mammalian promoter and obviously a nuclear targeting sequence are not needed? A possible reason for including the SV40 promoter sequence is that it enhances transfection efficiency and gene expression [108–110]. However, it is also capable of facilitating nuclear localization of DNA, thereby facilitating its potential integration into the genome [108–110]. Such very concerning issues must be appropriately addressed by global safety and regulatory agencies. Just as the risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis following modRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been acknowledged [111], similar attention should be paid to assess the potential risk of developing cancer associated with the genetic vaccines. In fact, the study conducted in the research facility at the FDA White Oak campus has acknowledged that modRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain DNA contamination far exceeding the established safety limits, raising concerns about the implications for public health [85].”
Indeed, “The carcinogenic risk associated with these technologies, which has long been known within the gene therapy field, represents an area of research that cannot be ignored, given the fundamental principle of medicine “primum non nocere” (first, do no harm)”.
The above scientific literature also buttresses a South Korean study of 8,407,849 individuals published in late September of 2025 that a clear correlation was demonstrated between COVID-19 vaccines and accelerate cancer. A growing number of oncologists are also pointing a finger at the mRNA shot causing aggressive cancers. All of the above explains the “critical gaps” that exist with respect to the knowledge as to how they (mRNA technology) work.
https://site.pheedloop.com/event/IMGC2026/speakers/SPEBGCXKSSN
I am deeply honored to be an Invited Guest Speaker at this years IMGC being held in Portland Oregon September 15-17, 2026. They asked me…I didn’t request this or pay for this.
After attending IMGC ( International Milk Genomics Consortium is based at UC Davis in CA but rotates venues all over the world ) for the last 14 years and traveling around the world to make sure not to miss the newest milk science, this year I was invited to speak. My PowerPoint is ready and I have thought through this message 500 times. This is the big scientific break that RAWMI has earned. My presentation is titled: This is How We Produce Raw Milk for Human Consumption from Grass to Glass. To be the only farmer in the room is always interesting to listen to PhDs and milk experts share their newest research. To be able to come home and then apply this research is profoundly filled with purpose.
It is SHOW TIME for Human Consumption Raw Milk, testing science, special high standards and practices behind raw milk for human consumption. The presentation will be broadcast to the University and research level PhDs around the world.