It’s easy to lose sight of just how far removed from real health many health-care workers are.

I’m back in Sarasota again, partly to tend to my mother, who has weakened a good deal since my last visit in April. She had a heart attack in early July and now is preparing to move into an assisted living facility adjoining the senior citizen apartment where she had been living for a little over a year.

During these past couple of visits, I have met a good number of health-care aides, who spend several hours a day with my mother, helping her dress, shower, and take her medication. One of the things I do each day I’m with my mother is to make her a vegetable juice drink. And each time I do it, I notice that the aide who happens to be there is extremely curious about juicing. They have questions about where I bought the juicer, what kind of vegetables I use, what other ingredients I could use, why fresh juices are good for you, and so on and so forth. (I’m going to ask Juiceman Junior for a commission pretty soon, because I’ll bet I’ve helped sell a few.)

Yesterday, an aide who said she was from Vietnam was on duty when I was making juice, and she launched into a similar series of questions. After I had explained about the juicer, my approach to making juice, and why I thought juices improve health, she began going in another direction.

She said she’s been in the U.S. about ten years, and is amazed by the kinds of situations she comes across in caring for the ill, especially in contrast to Vietnam. “So many people here in their fifties and sixties have serious conditions,” she said. I think she meant “chronic” conditions, since she described people having difficulties with endurance and mobility and requiring heavy-duty medication.

She said the food here is so different from what she was used to in Vietnam, and that she has read that there are hormones and antibiotics in the meat, and wonders if those might be factors in the chronic conditions. I guess since I seemed to know something about food, she inquired of me as to whether it is possible to find meat without hormones and antibiotics. I told her I try as much as possible to buy meat directly from farmers I know, and she wondered how you go about finding farmers. I told her she could begin by locating farmers markets, but that in the meantime, she could do okay by going to the local Whole Foods.

But I realized in explaining it that it is pretty overwhelming for someone who hasn’t read and investigated the subject, who is also struggling to pay a variable rate mortgage that goes up every six months or year, and whose healthcare training has consisted mainly of tasks like measuring blood pressure, administering injections, and providing first aid.

She’s not trained in nutrition, either for her patients or for herself. But she, and the handful of others I’ve met, are very eager to learn. It seems as if they could provide an important additional service to the people they care for. The only hitch could be that the agencies that hire these aides out might not be interested in providing such a service. After all, who wants all those patients becoming healthier?

***

On a related note, I had to chuckle in reading the exchange involving Elizabeth McInerney, Steve Bemis, Linda Diane Feldt, and myself following my posting about raw milk standards a few days ago, concerning the impact of antibiotics on milk. I suddenly imagined customers at the grocery store inquiring with management about when the cows that produced the milk might most recently have received antibiotics and it seemed pretty ridiculous. The gap between what is useful to know about our food and what we do know seemed awfully wide. One of the amazing things about buying direct from farmers you know is that you can have exchanges of the kind we had here, inquire from others whose opinions you respect, and make somewhat informed judgments.

***

And on another related note, there is a major article in today’s Boston Globe suggesting strongly that the movement to buy food locally really doesn’t help climate change, and in fact it may hurt by encouraging more energy usage than we realize. Nowhere in the article is there any mention about possibly improved nutritional benefits from food that is grown closer to home. In trying to reduce the benefit of locally grown food to some kind of mathematical equation, the analysis seems disconnected from reality. Maybe it’s a sign of growing concern among the major corporations about the strength of the eat-local movement?