You put the news on the back burner for a few days and what happens? Pots boiling over all over the place.

I had an April 30 deadline for my book about raw milk, so have been singularly focused the last few days. (I did meet the deadline, whew.)

But like everyone else, I’ve been wondering what to make of this swine flu thing, or whatever the hell they are calling it. It seems pretty clear now that, with most illnesses of the mild variety, the whole thing may well have been turned into something more akin to yelling “Fire!” in a movie theater than a public health issue.

Many people are so terrified, they won’t venture out, or they won’t touch door knobs. Schools have been shuttered, sports events postponed. On the opposite side of the precautionary scale, Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures tells me, “There has been a run on raw milk in California. Our sales this week where higher than ever before.We have been hearing that people are getting it because they want stronger immune systems in light of Swine Flu and the suggestion that weak immunity people are most likely to be affected negatively.”

It’s easy to blame the media, but the media are really only playing follow-the-leader. One leader has been the World Health Organization, the health arm of the United Nations, which raised its alert level to an unheard-of level, with its director stating Wednesday, “After all, it really is all of humanity that is under threat during a pandemic.”

I agree with a number of the recent reader comments warning us not to jump to conclusions about this situation. It’s just that when the professional bureaucrats start using hyperbole, you have to ask yourself: What’s the real agenda here? Usually, with these people, it’s a matter of gaining more power. After all, they’re too altruistic to be after money, right? (They leave that to Big Pharma and its various offshoots.)

And so my mind goes to something truly scary I just read: how President Obama, at that international monetary gathering in London a few weeks ago, apparently signed the U.S. on to international regulation of our financial system.

I know this sounds like weird conspiracy stuff, but it comes from a financial analyst I’ve been reading for several years, who is part of an organization I’ve found to be level-headed and fairly objective (even if I don’t always agree with its political leanings), and very much anti-conspiratorial and trusting of the sytem.

The author, Gary Halbert, argues that President Obama committed to placing the U.S. financial system under international regulation via something called the Financial Stability Board controlled by the G-20 countries. He says, “This new Financial Stability Board is so alarming in so many ways, and there may be no way to stop it now that Obama has signed onto it. And the worst part is that virtually no Americans have any idea about it. This is unbelievable!”

I bring this up because it’s clear that the financial crisis has been used as an excuse to make major changes to our financial system—mainly giving the federal government much more control over companies and regulations via trillions in bailouts that haven’t even been fully calculated. So why not a health crisis to centralize, and maybe even internationalize, our health care and public health systems?

It was adept use of fear tactics during the 1930s and 1940s that eventually led us into near-mandatory pasteurization and homogenization of milk. It was fear tactics again during the 1980s, this time by a Nader-backed consumer group, that led to the government prohibition on interstate sales of raw milk (which was opposed, by the way, by the regulation-wary Reagan Administration).

In the final analysis, when fear mongering is used as a cover to adjust who controls what, power (and control) shifts away from ordinary people and toward nameless faceless bureaucrats who tend to be arrogant in their knowledge of what is best for the rest of us. Watch out who becomes really sick from this flu bug.