bigstockphoto_Two_Bodyguards_1002817.jpgYesterday I was trying to explain the raw milk situation to Julie, the woman who has been cutting my hair the last 15 years or so. Julie and I usually chat during the time she is cutting and trimming about movies or new restaurants in the area, but the last couple of times I’ve been in to see her, we’ve gotten to talking about health and food, and in particular, raw milk.

Julie isn’t a foodie by any means, and she doesn’t read a lot about food and politics, but her ten-year-old son has attention deficit disorder (ADD) and she is convinced his diet, especially his sugar consumption, impacts his behavior. So when she asked me yesterday what I’ve been up to in the six weeks since I last had my hair cut, I told her, “Well, I’ve been in a few courtrooms and at a legislative hearing and on several dairy farms.”

I tried to explain the raw milk situation to her, how it seems to help some children with ADD and other chronic conditions, and how the government seems intent on preventing us from obtaining raw milk, even resorting to employing undercover agents.

“That’s crazy,” she said. “Why shouldn’t people who want it be able to buy it, and those who are afraid of it just stay away from it?”

Good question, I told her—unfortunately, one I can’t answer.

I find that when I step back from the situation a bit, I realize we’ve moved beyond the skirmish stage of this struggle, to real battle. It’s a battle that’s far from over, even allowing for the courtroom defeat last week over California’s AB 1735.

That became even more starkly apparent to me as I went back and reviewed all the cases involving undercover agents in raw milk cases, for an article I just wrote for The Nation, "Got Milk? Get Investigated". It started three years ago as a seemingly isolated situation involving an Amish farmer in Ohio, and has in recent months exploded into use in New York, California, and Pennsylvania.

I’ve always associated a government’s use of undercover agents (really, secret police) against ordinary citizens as the mark of a totally repressive regime—the old Soviet Union, present-day Cuba and Burma are the obvious examples. These are regimes that are afraid of their citizens. The U.S. obviously differs significantly from these places in many respects, yet it employs their tactics. All I can conclude is that the people in power must be very afraid.

One of the best ways for ordinary citizens to fight back is to identify the turncoats, embarrass them, and strip the veil of secrecy from their employers. That’s part of what I mean by education. Leave them no place to hide.