One of the things that continues to impress me about this blog is how especially emotional the discussions become when the subject turns to food safety and pathogens. Sometimes the conversations degenerate into name-calling, which seems to have become an unfortunate fact of life on the Internet. But more significant to me, the discussions often degenerate into grenade tosses between the pro-raw-milk crowd and the anti-raw-milk crowd. Sometimes, the anti people complain that they get run off the site, that their arguments arent listened to.

Ive always been puzzled by the way things degenerateafter all, were just talking about a tiny percentage of the populace that wants to drink milk in a natural state. But, of course, its not that simple. Were talking about important symbolism.

I think a few recent events have helped clarify how much more is going on here than a debate about milk. After my Nation article was published last week, the Haphazard Gourmet site wrote this about my article:

Writer David Gumpert has an excellent piece in the online version of The Nation: Toxic Foods, Tainted Loans, in which he parses the US relationship to China and its poison foodchain. ..The Hap Girls are mentioned in Mr. Gumpert’s piece. We’re somewhat surprised, because Mr. Gumpert is a Raw Milkie; he’s written repeatedly about Fed scrutiny of raw milk providers, and runs a pro-raw site called The Complete Patient, but apparently he’s unaware that The Hap Girls–and food poisoning attorney Bill Marler, whom he also quotes, are anti-raw. Hmmmmm….

Obviously, I knew these people were anti-raw when I wrote the article. I quoted them because I thought their concerns about the Chinese dairy situation and the spread of Chinese products around the world, including the U.S., were well placed. The Chinese dairy problem is a serious food safety issue, and these individuals seemed to have useful information and observations.

What is intriguing is their sense that because I am pro-raw I am the enemy. They cant comprehend that I can be both concerned about food safety and in favor of the right of consumers to have access to unpasteurized milk.

And that is the dilemma here. To them, food safety and food rights cant be separated, while to me they often are separate issues.

Kimberly Hartke, who comments frequently on this blog, has just written an excellent op-ed piece that explains the rights part of the issue very well.

Why this failure to distinguish between safety and rights? Ive said before that I believe theres an ideological disagreement here over the ongoing relevance of the Germ Theory. Others have pointed to the desire by Americans for ever-more regulation of our lives.

But Ive come to believe were dealing with another, perhaps bigger issue, really a cultural issue. Those who argue that even a few illnesses in well informed people who choose of their own free will to serve raw milk to their families trumps any rights issue, are offended that raw milk consumers would defy established scientific and public health dogma. Many of these opponents (certainly not all) dont just object to the fact that raw milk consumers want to drink raw milk. The opponents also dont like that the raw milk people often turn their backs on other givens in our society, like over-the-counter drugs and diet soft drinks and infant formula and public schooling.

Michael Pollan in his lengthy essay on food politics in Sundays NY Times Magazine, begins to get at it when he alludes to the charge of elitism sometimes leveled at the sustainable-food movement. If they wont drink the Diet Cokes and eat the burgers we barbeque at our cookouts, these people must be very weird.

Even assuming some weirdness, does that mean were not deserving of respect? The Hap Girls and Marler prefer the old-fashioned tactic of demonizing those who live differently or hold different viewsan effective tactic for sparking wars and encouraging discrimination. What’s much more disturbing is that government agencies have jumped on the bandwagon. When you demonize those who are different, you cant possibly eat from the same table, have a rational debate, or otherwise be tolerant of each other. Pretty sad.

***

NOTE: I have changed the site againthis time, by requiring a simple log-in procedure for those who want to post comments. Youll have to register by providing your name and a valid email address; the latter wont be published.