One of the things that continues to amaze me in the debate about raw milk safety is how strong the opinions against raw milk can be in light of how little we know about its role in illness. More often than not, it seems, raw milk is blamed even when it isn’t necessarily the culprit. And when pathogens are detected in raw milk, there may not be illnesses. If there are illnesses, it’s not clear why those who became ill were the chosen few. As we have seen on this blog, the uncertainties about cause are terribly upsetting to those who experience illness.

(By the way, there’s an excellent, well balanced summary about raw milk safety and pasteurization’s impact at the Northeast Organic Farming Association site:)

That’s why stories like those related by Ken Conrad (following my Friday post) ring so true. And that’s why Miguel’s argument about “balance” and “natural laws” is so appealing–on an instinctive level. Let’s trust in nature, which tends to keep things in balance, and illness won’t be a problem, or at least won’t be the problem it is in much of our society. Then Elizabeth McInerney says, sounds great, but no E.coli around my kids.

I think this gets at much of the conflict around raw milk. There are lots of otherwise clear thinking people (and I’m not focusing on Elizabeth) who feel, “All that natural systems stuff is great, but when it comes to my family and me, just keep the bad stuff away.” They ignore the fact that re-jiggering natural systems has unforeseen ramifications, as Miguel and others describe well—most notably, that E.coli 0157:H7 is essentially a man-created pathogen, recently discovered, growing out of over-use of grains and antibiotics in cattle feedlots.

It all reminds me a little of the argument over group homes for retarded and disabled individuals. What a wonderful idea, most people say—to set up special supervised homes so such individuals can live more independent and satisfying lives. But then when the sponsors find a home, neighbors often object. Well, great idea, but not on our block.

I don’t pretend to be above all this. When I’ve had infections, like bronchitis, I’ve wanted nothing more than to receive my antibiotics (though interestingly, the issue hasn’t come up for a few years now).

The problem for many of us is that natural systems aren’t entirely predictable, and our society increasingly demands predictability, elimination of risk, convenience, and complete comfort. Hurricanes and tornadoes are just two obvious examples of the unpredictability. For a spectacular example of how nature can surprise: science texts and nature films teach us that when a group of lions attacks a herd of buffalo or zebras, and pulls out a slow-moving member for food, we are seeing survival of the fittest. But even this order of things isn’t inescapable. There is an amazing video on Youtube that vividly captures the unpredictable aspects of natural systems.

It’s so easy to mess with natural systems, even when we are well intentioned. As Mary McGonigle Martin points out, something as simple as chlorinating swimming pools upsets the balance (which as a swimmer I’ve always sensed, but preferred to ignore). Given the terrible repercussions we are witnessing every day of tampering with natural systems, increasing numbers of us are ever more willing to trust nature’s unpredictability versus man’s.

***

Thanks to those who posted information about contributing to the legal defense fund involving Greg Niewendorp. I should have had that. 

One of the challenges associated with gathering at Greg’s farm is that we don’t know exactly when the Michigan Department of Agriculture and associated law enforcement types will show up. (And you can be sure they want to maintain uncertainty over this.) I’ll try to stay with this and provide relevant information as I obtain it. These MDA types more than anything else (even having their authority challenged by a single principled farmer) hate the light of inquiry shining on their escapades. So nothing would surprise me–even if they showed up in the middle of the night!